Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath He Coded Computers To Rig Elections


It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. -Joseph Stalin

One thing in US history is consistent throughout every single election cycle — allegations of voter fraud. These allegations, however, are not the ramblings of a kook with tinfoil wrapped around his head, they are substantiated and reach as high as the Supreme Court. Don’t believe it? Ask Al Gore and George W. Bush. If you think that the ruling class would leave it up to the voters to decide who gets elected, you should think again. Every single candidate who actually challenges the status-quo becomes a target. 

This year is one of the worst years ever for voter fraud, as it’s been captured on video — multiple times. Last Month, Hillary Clinton declared herself the winner of the Democratic Party in the much-anticipated Iowa caucuses. Immediately after the ‘victory,’ Clinton went on CNN to bask in her counterfeit fame. “I am so thrilled,” Clinton told Wolf Blitzer in an interview Tuesday afternoon. “My luck was not that good last time around, and it was wonderful to win the caucus, to have that experience.” However, fraud was so rampant that a C-SPAN video caught it. Clinton’s ‘victory’ would have nothing to do with ‘luck,’ and her premature declaration of the “razor thin” tie, was no mistake.

When campaign minions aren’t fudging the physical vote count, computers, tasked with tallying the vote, are susceptible to hacking. In 2006, the documentary Hacking Democracy, exposed Diebold and their role in rigging elections with their electronic voting machines. Clinton Eugene “Clint” Curtis is an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-employee of NASA and ExxonMobil, who also exposed election hacking. He is notable chiefly for making a series of whistleblower allegations about his former employer and about Republican Congressman Tom Feeney, including an allegation that in 2000, Feeney and Yang Enterprises requested Curtis’s assistance in a scheme to steal votes by inserting fraudulent code into touch screen voting systems. Curtis is seen in the video below testifying under oath in front of the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio. He tells the members how he was hired by Congressman Tom Feeney in 2000 to build a prototype software package that would secretly rig an election to sway the result 51 / 49 to a specified side.

After watching the video below, you’ll know why true change is hard to come by.

Vote Rigging

Source: Disclose

Click below for an interview with  Derrick Broze, journalist and founder of The Conscious Resistance Network on how and why your vote is pointless. He makes many excellent points and this is something everyone needs to hear.

Voting with Broze YT

Click below to hear this great interview with investigative researcher Bob Fletcher about everything from Planet X to CIA drug smuggling to underground cities for the elite!

Planet X LIT

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

One thought on “Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath He Coded Computers To Rig Elections

  1. Wow… Here in New York we HAD mechanical voting machines, the most fraud-proof, reliable way you could vote and be counted.

    However, using the straw-man excuse that they were not “ADA compliant” (which, IF that were so could have been easily remedied with low-tech solutions) they were replaced with paper ballots that you must mark and put in a reader. Seriously? I see no “low tables” with curtains to ensure the privacy of wheelchair voters, and what about people who can’t easily manage a sharpie without making stray marks? They could have easily pulled a lever. And what about blind people? I see no braille ballots, and just how would they privately “mark” them anyway? The machines only read actual marks. Braille labels on mechanical machines were easy, and all they had to do is pull a lever. How was the old way worse?

    There is no longer an equivalently private method (there was a curtain that completely surrounded you until you pulled the handle).

    There was also the much vaunted claim that it would reduce risk of voter fraud (we never had any such claims before that there WAS, but now it is LESS secure).

    They also said it would save money….how? By spending MORE money for a new system?

    And the stupidest of all - “these old mechanical machines are breaking down who is going to fix them?” Huh? Have they never heard of mechanics and what about all the companies that machine parts for a living? Especially here in New York?

    So they have been mothballed somewhere (we hope, just in case we can reverse this crap…) while elections get stolen by politicians who are the most corrupt or pay the most bucks…

    Gotta stop. My blood pressure is rising and giving me a headache. Since I am unable to make change (and I am not quiet, as you can sere) my only consolation is that these corrupt people will someday have to stand before God, and there’s no lyin’ to “the Man” and He will mete out perfect justice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s